Ratings:3/5 Reviewer:Nikhat Kazmi Site: TimesOfIndia
Like all epic heroes Conan the Barbarian too takes up the task of saving his village from the powerful supernatural evil forces. Which means loads of bloody moments with monsters, enemies, evil powers, head crushing, nose chopping, merciless slaughters... Let's not forget, all this comes naturally to our hero -- Conan was born in middle of the battlefield! The 2011 version does make you nostalgic for the original 1982 Conan where Arnold Schwarzenneger immortalised the Barbarian with his wooden -- yet winsome -- pure beefcake act.
Ratings:1.5/5 Reviewer:Shaikh Ayaz Site: Rediff
Conan the Barbarian is awfully rehashed with not a single saving grace (probably Morgan Freeman's presence instead of just his voice would have instilled some hope), Conan The Barbarian is second-class entertainment with zero compassion and sympathy towards its inhabitants -- and its audience. Marcus Nispel injects the film with intense sword-fighting, battle sequences and surreal clashes with the evil forces. When the characters are engaged in none of the above, they indulge in machinations which lack both intrigue and imagination. Where's the drama?
Ratings:2.5/5 Reviewer:Manhola Dargis Site: NYTimes
“Conan the Barbarian” now comes with 75 percent more gore.“Conan the Barbarian” tarted up with 3-D and introduced in voice-over by an understandably uncredited Morgan Freeman, is partly an origin story and partly proto-mythopoetic men’s movement gibberish involving good versus evil, the usual swords, sorcery and flagrantly bulgy masculinity.What Mr. Nispel brings is the gore and plenty of it (those severed heads are simply the sanguineous beginning) as well as some wit and surprisingly O.K. performances
Ratings:1/5 Reviewer:Mrigank Dhaniwala Site: Koimoi
What’s Good: The action sequences; the 3D effects.What’s Bad: The usual story; the average screenplay which has no twists and turns to offer; the farcical drama; the average performances; the excessive bloodshed; the loud and headache-inducing background score.Verdict: Conan The Barbarian will attract and entertain only a select few. It will flop at the Indian box-office. Loo break: Several in the second half.Watch or Not?: Watch only if you are a fan of heavy-dose action films with a lot of gore and blood.
Ratings:2/5 Reviewer:Daniel Pinto Site: DNA
Conan: The Barbarian, despite its sword and sorcery embellishments is just another vehicle for a just another dumb action movie.Expect a lot of brutality and decapitations to a pulse-pounding score but none of the imagination, bleakness and excitement of Howard’s works that since 1932 have been begging for a decent cinematic adaptation. After a spate of sub par horror remakes, Nispel fouled up something good all over again.
Ratings:2.5/5 Reviewer:Peter Deburge Site: Variety
With all earnestness, Nispel embraces the property's classic roots, placing this new "Conan" squarely within the tradition of sword-and-sorcery pics. Protagonist in this Marcus Nispel-directed reboot of Conan the Barbarian shows a modicum of respect toward the men he slays and topless wenches he liberates. More importantly, the well-executed pic solves the biggest challenge facing those hoping to breathe new life -- however nasty, brutish and short -- into the 79-year-old franchise by finding an actor capable of filling Ah-nuld's shoes, all of which portends brawny international biz, with sequels to follow.
Like all epic heroes Conan the Barbarian too takes up the task of saving his village from the powerful supernatural evil forces. Which means loads of bloody moments with monsters, enemies, evil powers, head crushing, nose chopping, merciless slaughters... Let's not forget, all this comes naturally to our hero -- Conan was born in middle of the battlefield! The 2011 version does make you nostalgic for the original 1982 Conan where Arnold Schwarzenneger immortalised the Barbarian with his wooden -- yet winsome -- pure beefcake act.
Ratings:1.5/5 Reviewer:Shaikh Ayaz Site: Rediff
Conan the Barbarian is awfully rehashed with not a single saving grace (probably Morgan Freeman's presence instead of just his voice would have instilled some hope), Conan The Barbarian is second-class entertainment with zero compassion and sympathy towards its inhabitants -- and its audience. Marcus Nispel injects the film with intense sword-fighting, battle sequences and surreal clashes with the evil forces. When the characters are engaged in none of the above, they indulge in machinations which lack both intrigue and imagination. Where's the drama?
Ratings:2.5/5 Reviewer:Manhola Dargis Site: NYTimes
“Conan the Barbarian” now comes with 75 percent more gore.“Conan the Barbarian” tarted up with 3-D and introduced in voice-over by an understandably uncredited Morgan Freeman, is partly an origin story and partly proto-mythopoetic men’s movement gibberish involving good versus evil, the usual swords, sorcery and flagrantly bulgy masculinity.What Mr. Nispel brings is the gore and plenty of it (those severed heads are simply the sanguineous beginning) as well as some wit and surprisingly O.K. performances
Ratings:1/5 Reviewer:Mrigank Dhaniwala Site: Koimoi
What’s Good: The action sequences; the 3D effects.What’s Bad: The usual story; the average screenplay which has no twists and turns to offer; the farcical drama; the average performances; the excessive bloodshed; the loud and headache-inducing background score.Verdict: Conan The Barbarian will attract and entertain only a select few. It will flop at the Indian box-office. Loo break: Several in the second half.Watch or Not?: Watch only if you are a fan of heavy-dose action films with a lot of gore and blood.
Ratings:2/5 Reviewer:Daniel Pinto Site: DNA
Conan: The Barbarian, despite its sword and sorcery embellishments is just another vehicle for a just another dumb action movie.Expect a lot of brutality and decapitations to a pulse-pounding score but none of the imagination, bleakness and excitement of Howard’s works that since 1932 have been begging for a decent cinematic adaptation. After a spate of sub par horror remakes, Nispel fouled up something good all over again.
Ratings:2.5/5 Reviewer:Peter Deburge Site: Variety
With all earnestness, Nispel embraces the property's classic roots, placing this new "Conan" squarely within the tradition of sword-and-sorcery pics. Protagonist in this Marcus Nispel-directed reboot of Conan the Barbarian shows a modicum of respect toward the men he slays and topless wenches he liberates. More importantly, the well-executed pic solves the biggest challenge facing those hoping to breathe new life -- however nasty, brutish and short -- into the 79-year-old franchise by finding an actor capable of filling Ah-nuld's shoes, all of which portends brawny international biz, with sequels to follow.
Fright Night (2011) Movie Review
Rating: 3/5Cast: Anton Yelchin, Colin Farrell, Sandra Vergara, Dave Franco, David Tennant
Director:Craig Gillespie
Time:1 hour 46 minutes
General: Horror
Movie Review: Why do once-upon-a-time good neighbours -- Yelchin and Jerry turn cross one fine day ? Not the fact that Yelchin's a cool dude at high school, while Jerry never went to high school. Not even that Yelchin's a hit with every babe on campus, while Jerry chooses to remain single. It's the Dr Hyde in the Jerry by day -- an alpha bloodsucker with a body count that knows no boundaries. Of course, this is made known to the neighbourhood by none other than Yelchin when students from his class go missing. And thus begins the duos `You've been watching me and I've been watching you' game that draws Charley's mom, best friend, girl friend...
A game that not only includes innumerable runs, but also a smart war of words between the vampire and its slayer: Yelchin offends Mr Vampire saying that `Jerry's a terrible name for a vampire'. Jerry gives it back saying Yelchin's mom's gives away a `bad smell', rather than his `girlfriend's ripe smell'. But like all things inhumane, the neighbourhood also takes a lot of convincing from Yelchin, and his recruit -- a professional vampire hunter and an LA showman Peter Vicent (David Tennan). Enter the 3D dramatics. Watch out for the vampire talons and fangs that leap out at you. Next up are fireballs and zooming arrows. And then come the cries of victims with blood oozing out of necks, hissing and screams. For a moment though you feel you're caught inside a dummy house of vampires. But then we are not complaining. For reasons two: First, is David Tennant who adds colour with his one liners and most importantly self-confidence issues when facing vampires. And second is Colin Farrell as the sexy and charming vampire who chooses blood to romance, has a wicked sense of humour and above all, `loves living a life of more than 400 years'. Are you listening the 17-till-I-die vampire! Copywright by: timesofindia
Spy Kids 4: All The Time In The World (2011) Movie Review
Ratings:1/5 Reviewer:Shaikh Ayaz Site: Rediff
Even if Spy Kids 4 is targeted at the kids, it takes its audience too lightly. Usually, such action-adventure films don't have a story and it's futile to look for one. What they have is a concept in place of a story and it must be reminded that even concepts divested of engagement with emotions are not worth it. Spy Kids 4 falls into the category of hype over heft.
Ratings:1/5 Reviewer:Mrigank Dhaniwala Site: Koimoi
What’s Good: The performances of the kids – Rowan Blanchard and Mason Cook; the funny lines spoken by Argonaut, the (speaking) family dog.What’s Bad: The underdeveloped script; the zero value addition by the 4D element (smell); absence of appealing costumes and gadgets, which were the hallmark of the previous Spy Kids films.Verdict: Spy Kids: All The Time In The World is a below-average fare. Apart from a section of the audience in the cities, it will find no appreciation at the Indian box-office.Watch or Not?: Watch only if your kids insist.
Final Destination 5 (2011) : Movie Review
Rating: 3/5Story: A bunch of friends escape death when a suspension bridge on which they are travelling collapses. Atleast they think so...For, as the mysterious coroner tells them, no one cheats on death. One by one, the survivors begin to meet their brutal end.
Movie Review: The Final Destination films may be pure kitsch with their grotesque celebration of the carnival of death, nevertheless, they have a faithful following amongst patrons of gore. Once again, the film primarily focuses on the sundry ways death can strike. And rest assured, the more bizarre, the better....
And the fact that one of the youngsters ( Nicholas D'Agosto) is prescient and can actually foresee the tragedies hardly reduces their misery. Each member of the unfortunate group faces a gruesome and unpredictable end as screws, electrical short circuits, laser beams, factory and gym equipment and even harmless drops of water become death traps.
The death scenes have shock value and sometimes end up as funny too: black humour, you see. Often, you have to shut your eyes at the sheer bloodiness of it all. Go, test your appetite for gore.
Movie Review: The Final Destination films may be pure kitsch with their grotesque celebration of the carnival of death, nevertheless, they have a faithful following amongst patrons of gore. Once again, the film primarily focuses on the sundry ways death can strike. And rest assured, the more bizarre, the better....
And the fact that one of the youngsters ( Nicholas D'Agosto) is prescient and can actually foresee the tragedies hardly reduces their misery. Each member of the unfortunate group faces a gruesome and unpredictable end as screws, electrical short circuits, laser beams, factory and gym equipment and even harmless drops of water become death traps.
The death scenes have shock value and sometimes end up as funny too: black humour, you see. Often, you have to shut your eyes at the sheer bloodiness of it all. Go, test your appetite for gore.
Copywright:Timesofindia
Captain America: The First Avenger (2011) : Movie Review
Film: “Captain America: The First Avenger
Cast: Chris Evans, Hugo Weaving, Hayley Atwell, Tommy Lee Jones, Stanley Tucci
Director: Joe Johnston
Rating:(3 Out of 5)
The powers that maybe in the US have always understood the hold of the arts over its citizens and so used it for their own benefit. A comic book superhero was thus born in the 1940s, whose name had the name of the country and who almost wore the nation’s flag.The superhero, Captain America, featured in many comic books, short films and other promotional materials. He served patriotism on a star-spangled red and blue shield platter, sold war bonds and was thus actually instrumental in winning the war for America.
Quite coincidentally of course, as the debt-ridden US is going through financially warring times, Captain America marks his resurrection, for the umpteenth time, this time on the silver screen.
Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) is a lanky and weak young man who is perennially bullied. Yet he desperately wants to serve the country by enlisting in the army during the Second World War. He is rejected, till a scientist recognises his good heart and injects him with a serum that turns him into, well, literally a superhero.
It’s but a matter of time before our lad saves the world.
The original character of Captain America had some interesting but predictable metaphors injected into it.
The skimpy little boy perennially bullied was supposed to be the world terrorised by fascism. The serum was America joining the war. And obviously, Captain America wearing the star spangled banner and winning the war was meant to depict America finally leading the world to victory.
The filmmakers realised that 70 years on this metaphor is no longer valid. Hence, though set during the Second World War the film creates a bigger enemy under Hitler’s shadow in Hydra, who becomes Red Skull, a character from the comics.
It’s a move that makes the film work.
Though linear, predictable and simplistic in its treatment, much like superhero films of yore, the attention to detail in aspects like special effect, cinematography and steady pace keeps the film ticking along to a decent finale.
Credit goes to director Joe Johnston who turns a simple script into a decent film. He has good experience serving him – having directed “The Rocketeer” two decades back, which besides inspiration, provided a lot of visual reference points to another Marvel film franchisee, “Ironman”.
After America had won the war, people overdosed on patriotism, rejected Captain America and the comic book died down.
A resurrection failed miserably, till “The Avengers” comic series in the mid-60s made him the leader of a pack of superheroes. The world, unlike during his first birth, did not need saving anymore. Today however, the world does need a saviour, what with the American economy in tatters.
Thus in this resurrected avatar, the captain’s prime job would be to save America. From whom, you’d ask? Well, obviously, from the bully stalking the planet – America itself.
Copyrights: IANS
Rise of the Planet of Apes (2011) Movie Review
Movie Rating : 3.5/5
Ratings:4/5 Reviewer:Nikhat Kazmi Site: TimesOfIndia
Don't mess with nature: this is the simple message of this superbly mounted film. But more than the simplicity of the message, it is the fact that this must be one of the warmest and most humane sci fi fantasies of late that makes Rise of the Planet of the Apes such a gripping saga. It's warm, it's sensitive, it's dramatic, it's larger-than-life... Yes, Rise of the Planet of the Apes is spectacular cinema with loads of lessons for money and power obsessed mankind.This one's both a mass entertainer and a film with a high intelligent quotient. In short, Rise of the Planet of the Apes is everybody's weekend getaway...Ratings:3.5/5 Reviewer:Daniel Pinto Site:DNA
Rise of the Planet of the Apes, a reboot of the Planet of the Apes franchise, narrates the events that led to apekind eventually making a monkey out of humanity.Even though you may go in with an idea about how things might play out, the film always manages to keep you on the edge of your seat.Though, the apes are significantly less anthropomorphic than the way they are when Taylor sees themin the future and, in all likelihood, we may not be seeing the Statue of Liberty halfway submerged on the dreadful Planet of the Apes in any future sequel, with Rise, the series starts off on the right paw...
Ratings:1.5/5 Reviewer:Roshni Devi Site:Koimoi
What’s Good: The build-up of the story; Caesar’s transformation from ape to super-intelligent ape; the visual effects.What’s Bad: The violent apes might put some viewers off.Verdict: Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes is a fare that will excite fans of science-fiction films only...
Ratings:4/5 Reviewer:Daily Bhaskar Site:Dainik Bhaskar
If you're an animal lover, then Rise of Planet of Apes is a must watch. It's a thrilling ride. The beautifully captured forests and Serkis' amazing portrayal of an ape, are all are worth a watch. Watching apes at loggerheads with humanity, is a thrilling experience.This is surely a flick that'll equally excite your kids. And, if you're fond of action flicks then, this one's your movie this weekend...
Ratings:3.5/5 Reviewer:Peter Deburge Site:Variety
"Rise of the Planet of the Apes" makes for an impressive, if predictably downbeat prequel to a franchise famous for unhappy endings. Thanks to stunning advances in performance capture technology, director Rupert Wyatt successfully ditches the cumbersome makeup appliances of past chapters, building the story around a cast of photoreal CG simians convincing enough to identify with as characters, rather than just special effects. Created in the same downer spirit as the recent "Terminator" prequels, "Rise" rewrites "Apes" lore to provide an alternate history for mankind's extinction, brought about by genetic testing rather than atomic irresponsibility...
Ratings:4/5 Reviewer:Giles Hardie Site:Sydney Morning Herald
There are two categories of people who will be disappointed by The Rise of the Planet of the Apes - those seeking an hour and a half of apes killing humans, and those who really enjoyed Tim Burtons ill conceived remake. For everyone else, get ready for an origins film that really lives up to the name.With winking nods to, and carefully established foundations for, the original films, The Rise of the Planet of the Apes will please old fans and win over a menagerie of new ones. This is a genuine evolution in digital film making, matched by a razor sharp script that delivers an apetastic action blockbuster...
Ratings:B- Reviewer:Owen Gleiberman Site:Entertainment Weekly
The biggest disappointment of the halfhearted, digitally impersonal Rise of the Planet of the Apes, apart from how just-okay it is in almost every way, is that the grandeur is gone. Rise of Planet of the Apes is just an apes-on-the-rampage creature feature, with a decent setup, a wobbly second act, and a glorified-videogame urban-action payoff...
The Tree of Life Rating: 3.5/5
The Tree of Life Reviews
Ratings:3/5 Reviewer:Rajeev Masand Site:IBNLive
The Tree Of Life is a hugely ambitious film. It polarizes audiences, calling for endless discussions and debate on what it’s trying to say through its relentless visual ideas. This Palme D’Or winner is a modern mind-bender. Writer-director Terrence Malick makes The Tree Of Life a deeply personal film, dipping into his own childhood, but all the while questioning God, his reasons for inflicting suffering, the beauty of life, and the ambiguity and the inexplicable nature of death.I’m going with three out of five for The Tree of Life. It’s profound and poetic, yet requires much patience on the viewer’s part. To be fair, director Terence Malick’s beautiful yet self-indulgent film feels like the cinematic equivalent of watching a tree grow.
Ratings:4/5 Reviewer:Shaikh Ayaz Site:Rediff
There are very few, almost only handful films as compellingly personal in its scope and vision as The Tree of Life. It is sheer poetry as it glides from one moment to the next, meditatively aiming for the mysteries of infinity, spirituality and cosmology.The Tree of Life invokes questions whose answers lay in the belief in God.The Tree of Life is a brave addition to the discipline of filmmaking that traces its roots straight to the oeuvre of Bergman and Tarkovsky
Ratings:3.5/5 Reviewer:Daniel Pinto Site:DNA
The Tree of Life encompasses the micro and macro aspects of life and living in a way hitherto thought impossible in cinema.For all its deliberate disjointedness, The Tree of Life isn't pretentious, and it isn't, least of all, predictable. If, while reading this review you think a weak attention span or low tolerance for ambiguity may serve as a deterrent to you gaining something from the film, give it a shot anyway. You just might end up being pleasantly moved to tears.
The Smurfs (2011) : Movie Review
The Smurfs: Fun film for the family
Cast: Neil Patrick Harris, Hank Azaria, Jayme Mays
Voiceovers: Jonathan Winters, Anton Yelchin, Fred Armisen
Director: Raja Gosnell
Rating: 4/5
There are films which smack in the beginning, often even before the crisis is established, and make you predict the end. As an experienced viewer, you are aware this is the case with 95 percent films and that it is not the destination, but the film’s journey that truly matters. The journey through Smurf land is filled with clean, well humoured moments that will charm families.
Trying to escape the stupidly evil wizard Gargamel (Hank Azaria) six little, blue, happy creatures called The Smurfs are transported from their magical land to New York. They land in the home of marketing executive Patrick (Neil Patrick Harris). With the wizard close on their heels, the Smurfs have to find a way to get back home, and quick.
One of the strongest elements that a film with a predictable story needs to have is some unbelievably adorable characters. This film has a ‘Smurf’ full of these cuteness.
The usual suspects, the six Smurfs are obviously cute. Yet, the funniest one of the lot is the evil, laughing kitty. Never after the cute cat in Shrek, has there been such an adorable feline in filmdom. Pair him with a dumb-witted master who is supposed to be a wizard, and you have a laugh riot blowing.
The sub-plots and twists in the tale are expected and though there is a very high overdose of ’smurfy’ terms, its delicate handling by director Raja Gosness ensures this does not get to you.
Though a film that stays literally true to the one created by the writer of Smurfs, Peyo, (like in a popular animated series of the ’80s and a film) would have been wonderful, this one – a mix of live action and animation – works as well.
There have been a decent number of films with the mix of live action and animation in recent times like “Alvin and the Chipmunks”, “Garfield”, and “Hop”, all three directed by one man – Tim Hill. Yet, this is the best of the lot and a welcome addition to a sub-genre that saw its peak in the ’50s but seems to have lost its sheen in recent times despite advances in CGI.
“The Smurfs” is a fun film meant purely as a family entertainer with the cuteness of a “Home Alone” and “Babe” where everything is gimmicky and beyond proportions. And just like in these two films, the director knows his limits and ‘where’ and ‘why’ and most importantly, ‘how’ not to cross over those limits.
Via : INAS
Cowboys and Aliens Review
Cowboys and Aliens Rating: 2/5
Ratings:2/5 Reviewer:Rajeev Masand
Ratings:2/5 Reviewer:Shaikh Ayaz Site:Rediff
There's not a single piece of line that you carry back home, a brazen insult to the genre which is credited with some of the greatest quotes in movie history. Until it arrives at its breathtaking climax, Cowboys & Aliens is who-is-who guess game with the Apaches, thieves and bandits intersecting Jake (Daniel Craig ) at the Old West.What I find disturbing here is the marked lack of humour, the laughter and mirth. Cowboys & Aliens takes itself far too seriously and ends up only as a coldly detached saga of men in ruthless duel with a power that can never be realistically defeated.
Ratings:2.5/5 Reviewer:Shubhra Gupta Site:IndianExpress
There are cowboys, and there are aliens, and then there are cowboys and aliens. And still, all it comes down to is gold. Based on a graphic novel, this is one of those films which makes considerable effort to set up the atmosphere, the details, the actors, the setting – besides experimenting with what is potentially a great idea -- and then just goes plain lazy with what to do with them.
Ratings:1.5/5 Reviewer:Mrigank Dhaniwala Site:Koimoi
What’s Good: Daniel Craig’s performance; the cinematography. What’s Bad: The hackneyed and boring script; the lack of any emotional connect with the audience; the indigestible premise of the film. Verdict: Cowboys & Aliens is a disappointing fare. Even Daniel Craig’s name will not be able to do much for the film at the Indian box-office.
Ratings:2/5 Reviewer:Manhola Dargis Site:NewYorkTimes
Favreau wavers uncertainly between goofy pastiche and seriousness in a movie that wastes its title and misses the opportunity to play with, you know, ideas about the western and science-fiction horror.
Ratings:--/5 Reviewer:W Doetreve Site:IMDB
Cowboy and Aliens starts out great as they really attempt to make it a Western and stick to Western sensibilities. Then, it degenerates in to a big fat throw-everything-at-the-screen-and-see-what-sticks insult. By the end you feel cheated of everything: fun adventure, a tangible sense of peril, anything approaching drama and even a sense of wonder. You experience or feel NONE of those things watching this movie.
Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 2 Movie Review
The boy wizard is back and for finishing what he and Lord Voldemort had started long time back. The final part of the last book in Harry Potter Series Harry Potter and Half Blood Prince comes with a promise of enthralling its zillions of fans all over the world. The Part 1 ended on a sad note of Voldemort opening the grave of Professor Dumbledore, whereas the second part is more of an action sequel with all the wand out of the cloaks and shooting charms and curses like cats and dogs all around.
The three friends Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Hermione (Emma Watson), and Ron (Rupert Grint) which set out with a mission to ending the terror of Lord Voldemort Ralph Fiennes take on the Gringott's Wizarding Bank, fight the Death Eaters and then to Hogwarts as their final place to hide before the fight to death begins. The spectacular set pieces and detailed work that goes into making these can surely make the audience realize about all the hard work that goes behind the scenes just to make alive this magical world for you to see. As the last part of the seventh book installment the scenes are much darker and more with shades of grey and black and more serious in presentation. Director David Yates has put in his last of brilliant efforts to make the best of the last with every character playing its part to the T.
Final climax is fought between the two protagonists who started it all Harry and Voldemort all in a bloody fight ending in killing the anti-hero in the end. Few sad demises where some of the characters are dead leave the audience sad. But the ending is a finally the win of the good and end of the evil. A must watch for all the fans of Harry and his wizarding world.
Write your Review By Comment
LARRY CROWNE - This 'Crowne' is not a jewel
Rating:
Review by Gaurav Gadre
Tom hanks dons several hats for this one as he writes, directs and acts for Larry Crowne. With a simple story the movie relies heavily for a strong screenplay to make its case. Although the movie did have its moments, it fails to make an impact in the end.
Larry is a 9 time employee of the month, but even he is not spared by a downsizing in his company. In this tumultuous times when he has the loan of his house to pay off, Larry realizes that it was his lack of college education that caused his downfall. This makes Larry go in for a college education. He instantly makes a connection with most of the students due to his amicable nature. He meets Talia who gives him a lifestyle make over. Larry falls head over heels for his teacher Mercedes but cant date her because of several complications. In the end its all about how Larry turns his life around.
The movie has decent treatment in some portions but the rest of it really hazy. The love angle between Larry and Mercedes is totally out of sync. Not once did I feel that there was any chemistry between the two. Infact there is more chemistry between Larry and Talia. The movie yo yos between a redemption story and a rom com. I felt as though there were too many spices in this dish.
Tom Hanks the actor and director excel but Tom Hanks the writer fails. The script and screenplay turns out to be very flaky. Julia Roberts' character is confusing. It is irritating after a certain point in time. The best character by far was that of Talia, played by Gugu Mbatha-Raw. It almost felt as if you wanted to see her whenever she was on screen and off it.
Overall, Larry Crowne is probably not the choice to shell out money for a seat in the theater. Maybe a fit for DVD rental.
Reasons to watch:
1) Tom Hanks fan club
2) Gugu's acting
Reasons to skip:
1) Flaky screenplay
2) Fails to create the magic
Rating:
(2.3/5)
Review by Gaurav Gadre
Tom hanks dons several hats for this one as he writes, directs and acts for Larry Crowne. With a simple story the movie relies heavily for a strong screenplay to make its case. Although the movie did have its moments, it fails to make an impact in the end.
Larry is a 9 time employee of the month, but even he is not spared by a downsizing in his company. In this tumultuous times when he has the loan of his house to pay off, Larry realizes that it was his lack of college education that caused his downfall. This makes Larry go in for a college education. He instantly makes a connection with most of the students due to his amicable nature. He meets Talia who gives him a lifestyle make over. Larry falls head over heels for his teacher Mercedes but cant date her because of several complications. In the end its all about how Larry turns his life around.The movie has decent treatment in some portions but the rest of it really hazy. The love angle between Larry and Mercedes is totally out of sync. Not once did I feel that there was any chemistry between the two. Infact there is more chemistry between Larry and Talia. The movie yo yos between a redemption story and a rom com. I felt as though there were too many spices in this dish.
Tom Hanks the actor and director excel but Tom Hanks the writer fails. The script and screenplay turns out to be very flaky. Julia Roberts' character is confusing. It is irritating after a certain point in time. The best character by far was that of Talia, played by Gugu Mbatha-Raw. It almost felt as if you wanted to see her whenever she was on screen and off it.
Overall, Larry Crowne is probably not the choice to shell out money for a seat in the theater. Maybe a fit for DVD rental.
Reasons to watch:
1) Tom Hanks fan club
2) Gugu's acting
Reasons to skip:
1) Flaky screenplay
2) Fails to create the magic
Write your Review by Comment :)
Transformers: Dark of the Moon : Hollywood Movie Review
Rating:
(2.9/5)
Transformers gave todays children (and teenagers) a new wave of entertaining cinema. Inspired by toys from Hasbro, suddenly every child (and the child in me) wanted to have an action figure of the Autobots. Having long animated conversations with my then 5 year old son about the battle of the BOTs seemed to be a fun thing to do. Then Michael Bay went and spoilt it in 2009 with Revenge of the Fallen. Too much hype, too much CGI and no plot whatsoever, lead to the franchise losing its sheen. Then one heard that Bay was not giving up without a fight. In order to cash in on the successful brand of the franchise, he promised the third part to be more humane. Again that lead to hype and expectations. Also, he topped it up with the latest spice in town, 3D!
Just as part 2 had proven, there is not much story in this series, just like the Pirates franchisee. So the battle between the Autobots and the evil Decepticons is still being fought and this time there is again a evil plan by the Decepticons to defeat the resilient Autobots and take over planet Earth. The human race as always, represented by the US of America, decides to dump the Autobots in a moment of crisis, with a handful of believers still asking the question what were you doing then?. In the end, All is well.
The Autobots are still being led by the resilient Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen) who hopes to lead the Autobots to salvation. He is aided by Ironhide, Bumblebee, Ratchet, Sideswipe, Wheelie (a former decepticon), Brains, Skids, Mudflap, Silverbolt and the Wreckers.
The Decepticons are again being led by Megatron, (he just doesnt give up! Hugo Weaving), Shockwave, one of the main antagonists this time, Starscream, Soundwave, Laserbeak & Barricade.
Leonard Nimoy (Spock of Star Trek) as the voice of Sentinel Prime is brilliant.
Well the humans have their share too. Megan Fox is no more Sams girlfriend. Sorry folks. So if you were going to see some Megan display, bad luck. But Sams new hottie girlfriend now is Carly Spencer (Rosie Huntington Whiteley, a Victorias Secret model). This is her film debut and she is introduced exactly keeping her past experience in mind, showing her derriere. Honestly, Foxs bad luck! Cos Carly provides enough eye candy to the audiences.
Shia LaBeouf as the now graduate, job hunting Sam is more in control than the earlier 2 parts. Instead of just reacting to situations, he wants to be and does seem in control of things this time around. His interaction with the Autobots is decreasing with each and every installment. Pity.
Josh Duhamel (Las Vegas) & Tyrese Gibson (Transformers, Fast Five) reprise their roles as the American NEST officers. John Turturro (Cars 2, Secret Window, Quiz Show) as the terminated Agent Simmons, John Malkovich (Red, Con Air) as Sams boss, Patrick Dempsey (Made of Honor, Enchanted, Greys Anatomy) as Carlys boss, Frances McDormand (Burn After Reading, Ms. Pettigrew Lives for a Day, Fargo) as Charlotte Mearing, Secretary of Defense, Kevin Rudd (Unstoppable, Vicky Christina Barcelona) and Julia White (Michael Clayton) as Sams parents provide the human cast for this CGI infested flick.
Starting off with a montage of footage from the 60s, weaving the plot with Americas landing on the moon was very innovative. Just like Michael Vaughan had interspersed the Cuban Crisis in the latest X-Men installment. The first half of the film is completely different in its treatment from the earlier 2 installments. There is more of story and drama here than before. The films dark theme gives it various layers for it to unfold itself to the audiences. But only to the half way point. Post interval, I guess the money bags took over everything, scripting, directing, CGI and worse of all, the editing. It seems they asked the editing trio of Roger Barton, William Goldenberg and Joel Negron to take a holiday. It reminded me of the late Stanley Kubricks unfinished masterpiece A.I. which was then completed by Spielberg himself.
Till the interval one could see or rather feel the drama in the film but post interval, clichd scenarios and formula cinema took over, clearly showing the different treatments of the 2 Directors. Likewise, in T3, in the pre interval portions, one does feel that Bay has tried to make an effort to add drama and very intense drama to the script. But post interval, he seems to have lost the plot. There is no coherence in the narrative at all.
These kinda films are never performance based, hence there is no particular performance that can be earmarked. Malkovich, though brilliant is wasted. Duhamel & Gibson only have to look tensed throughout and order good sounding commands at their teams. But the treat in the film is to watch McDormand, Turturro & Dempsey. The best scene however is stolen by Julia White when she advises Sam on his love life.
3D again is a waste in the film. barring a few scenes here and there, totally not worth the pain on the nose. The only good thing being, it is not as dark in 3D as Pirates 4.
No catchy dialogues here barring a few words here and there like Sam barking Thats my car or the Autobots mouthing Class Dismissed or Weve got a Mexican Standoff here.
The CGI usage is brilliant. But where Michael Bay scores is in the man on man fight sequences between the robots. They are ear splitting, gut wrenching, hard core raw. Brilliant. But he could and should have cut the climax by 30 minutes at least. Now for a movie with a run time of 2 hours 35 minutes, it is a lot! But imagine that is what one has to endure in the climax. In order to highlight the effects and showcase various set pieces, it actually disconnects the viewer. Making what could have been a brilliant film into a mediocre formula movie.
Tonites paid preview, was proof of the fact that people still love the franchise. Michael Bay & Steven Spielberg, take a bow! For you will again manage to rake in millions, as my now 9 year old son will be seeing the film on Saturday morning.
Does it have The Y Factor:NO
Rating:4/10
Write your Review below by Comment :)
The film has many things going for it, and yet has a few fatal flaws that prevent it from rising above its hackneyed script.
A super hero who doesnt believe he can save the world till his pretty eye candy of a girl friend is captured by geeky-friend-turned-evil-mini on, Green Lantern has a storyline that has been done to death. Performances in the film are painfully affected and over the top. Characters lack depth and end up being two dimensional card board cut outs, mouthing inane lines without any conviction.
Green Lantern relies heavily on CGI. A whole new world of Oa is created, aka Avatar, but this again reeks of computer game-standards. Some scenes in fact looked straight out of our homegrown super flop Love Story 2050.
Add to this, is the slow snail-like pace the film unravels at. Story and character settings take like forever and there is far too less action in between to keep the viewer interested. The good action scene, at the climax, is too late and too short to engage.
The story also suffers from a weak villain, Parallax. A CGI character, there is very little in it to actually fear. So when the heroine is held hostage by Hector, the geek friend turned villains form, one really doesnt bother since we already know she is going to be saved and the evil vanquished anyways.
And of course, the film has to be in 3D. The inherent problems with 3D exist here too. Its too dark, good in the CGI parts, but really sad on real sets in the portions on earth.
Green Lantern disappoints, especially since its not even been a week since the exhilarating high of X-Men First Class. It isnt a bad film it just should have been so much better.
Write Your Review below by comment :)
The town of Radiator Springs & its various inhabitants which played such an important role in Lightning McQueen's (voice of Owen Wilson) journey of self-discovery the first time around are this time relegated to cameo-like screen time early on and late in the film. McQueen is competing in a World Grand Prix accompanied by his faithful tow-truck buddy Mater (voice of Larry the Cable Guy). Everything is going great until a fallout between the two sends mater on an adventure of his own resulting in Mater being the main protagonist of the piece rather than McQueen. British super-spy car agents, lots of globe-trotting, alternate fuel conspiracies and much more make up the backbone of this flick.
Right off the glorious opening sequences which mirrors and betters the best of what any James Bond flick has to offer, the audience is in for what is essentially an action-adventure movie. This 'Bond-for-kids' version has all the pyrotechnics and dazzle people expect from a kids flick and oddly enough holds a nice little tale about the secondary characters in life who might hold the key to something bigger than they are usually given credit for. But unfortunately since the movie most of the time is lost in the slapstick and trying to be cool routine it forgets the essence of the tale, thus resulting in an underwhelming final product.
The one thing I can't find fault about is the glorious animation which is an absolute beauty. The rich color palate and the creatively conjured world full of automobiles in everything is such a sight to behold that I was constantly keeping an eye out for the smaller details. Just look at the fluid animation in the opening scene to realize how well it has been rendered.
'Cars 2' may not be the perfect animated movie and is a far cry at time from Pixars usual lofty standards but it is a perfectly enjoyable watch which provides enough laughs and dazzle for your money.
Write your review below the comment :)








